Jack Smith knows he has a lousy case against President Trump so he wants to keep him from presenting evidence of the police and undercover agitators who caused the riot, thus clearing Trump.
Let’s face it, Smith does not give a damn about the Constitution when it stands in his way to sending Trump to prison. Smith does not want the truth to come out about how the violence began.
Jack Smith’s 20-page filing said:
“Through public statements, filings and argument in hearings before the court, the defense has attempted to inject into this case partisan political attacks and irrelevant and prejudicial issues that have no place in a jury trial.”
“Although the court can recognize these efforts for what they are and disregard them, the jury — if subjected to them — may not. The court should not permit the defendant to turn the courtroom into a forum in which he propagates irrelevant disinformation, and should reject his attempt to inject politics into this proceeding.”
Smith’s case is currently on March 4th, 2024 but Trump’s team is arguing that Trump has immunity and it has to go to an appeals court and then the Supreme Court not to mention the fact that Smith is withholding vital information, meaning the trial could be moved to 2025.
NEW: Jack Smith, in likely vain attempt to keep March 4 trial date, filed another pretrial related to what the jury should be allowed to consider. (All pretrial deadlines now on hold)
Smith wants to preclude the jury from hearing evidence about Jan 6 in his Jan 6 case: pic.twitter.com/m8hgn6eGoJ
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 27, 2023
“Evidence about undercover actors holds no probative value here.”
I am no lawyer, but that statement looks like Smith is a clown who dos not want a fair trial. His case hinges on Trump inciting the riot. So if the undercover and Capitol Police force incited the riot, it would seem that would be extremely relevant.
It is a legitimate question backed up by videos of Ray Epps and the Capitol police shooting into a peaceful crowd with rubber bullets and flashbangs.
Michael Waller, a senior analyst for strategy at the Center for Security Policy specializing in propaganda, political warfare, psychological warfare, and subversion, said he was at the Capitol on January 6 and witnessed:
- Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
- Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;
- Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGA hats backward and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators; and
- Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, wearing similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.
Antifa terrorists also infiltrated the Capitol protest.
Trump supporters were blamed for all of the violence and chaos at the Capitol on January 6, but according to a former FBI agent, Antifa terrorists infiltrated the Trump rally.
Over the summer Tucker Carlson said he interviewed the Chief of Police who was at the Capitol on January 6 and in charge of security that day.
“I interviewed the Chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on FOX by the way, I was fired before it could air. I’m gonna interview him again,” Tucker said. “But Steven Sund was the totally non-political, worked for Nancy Pelosi.”
“I mean this was not some right-wing activist – he was the Chief of the Capitol Police on January 6, and he said, ‘Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, that crowd was filled with federal agents…’”
Tucker continued, “As time passed, it became more and more obvious that the core claims they made about January 6 were lies.”