There have been two major facts that have come out about the faux election in Arizona in 2022. Kari Lake will be returning to court to try and prove that the signatures did not match but officials had them counted anyway. Three whistleblowers have come forward and testified to that fact.
Steven Richer, the Democrat in Republican clothing has stopped Lake from examining the mail-in ballots to see if the signature on the mail-in ballot envelope matches the one on their registration.
Maricopa County has confirmed what we all knew to be true:
Ballot signatures DO NOT MATCH.
Election Officials brazenly HIDING EVIDENCE from us.
This is the smoking gun.
Unfortunately for them, I’m not giving up — even if that means legally forcing them to hand over evidence. https://t.co/feDWyYfhNS
— Kari Lake (@KariLake) March 31, 2023
Lake allegedly lost her election by about 17,000 votes. But the program change on election day was prevalent in 59% of the precincts. Curiously 92% of those precincts are deep red precincts. Something is rotten in Denmark and Hunter Biden isn’t even there.
Go figure. Like all elections since 2018, where Democrats were losing, they quit counting the votes and miraculously the Democrats won. When will the GOP wake up and do something about this? My guess is that with a few exceptions, they won’t.
SORCERY-O-RAMA! Every time I’ve seen states stop counting votes for a few days, the struggling Democrat candidate has miraculously prevailed.
In Arizona, the software they use to verify signatures only requires a 10% match. That is ludicrous. Name one person other than Joe Biden or any random Democrat who can be wrong 90% of the time and still keep their job.
If you think they use this software without realizing how terrible it is, I expect you spend Christmas Eve waiting for Santa to slide down your chimney. The closest you have ever come is when your Uncle Fred slides off his barstool.
FAST FACTS: The 2022 Maricopa Election
- The AZ Supreme Court ruled in favor of Lake last week, granting that she may — if she can — prove there was signature fraud “in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election.” The proof must be based on a competent mathematical basis “to conclude that the outcome would plausibly have been different, not simply an untethered assertion of uncertainty.”
- Lake says there were “ballot custody” issues that broke the law.
- Roughly 60% of the voting machines in Maricopa County — Lake’s stronghold — were subject to “errors” on Election Day.
- When Verus Pro was tested back before the 2020 election, election clerk Rey Valenzuela called the practice run a “sh*t show.”
- Lake asserts that outsourcing the signature verification process is illegal.
- Long lines to vote, caused by the machines rejecting so many ballots, forced voters to leave voting centers without casting a ballot — all in Lake strongholds.
BUSTED-O-RAMA! Though Maricopa County denies using the Verus Pro software, former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright shared a copy of the contract between the county and the firm that created the program, Runbeck Election Services, with the outlet Just the News.
The second major revelation was made by Bob Hughes, a retired ballot printer. Hughes confirmed there were over 600 versions of the Maricopa County ballot (see the video below).
Hughes recently testified that “an intentional change was made to the printers affecting the DAY OF Election ballots” used in Maricopa County in the 2022 election.
Hughes stated — under penalty of perjury — that there was some serious skullduggery involving the size of the ballots in Maricopa County. Here is an excerpt from his testimony:
This indicates that it was not possible that a BALLOT STYLE other than a 20″ PDF could have been used, even by accident for the 2022 election. Yet, on Election Day a substantial number of wrong sized ballots were printed. This clearly indicates that the interference caused by 19″ ballots had to have been by someone from MCTEC or by someone hacking into the MCTEC system. Since no failures occurred during even one test of the system and since all the machines were made tamperproof and held in security until use, no other possible reason is plausible. The assertion that random accidents occurred on election Day is impossible. A large number of printers, all printing ballots of the wrong 19 inch size on Election Day, is not a random accident. This also indicates that since many ballots failed the scanning by the tabulators due to size, the issue was with the Voting Center on-demand printers. It is also not plausible that the exact same random accident occurred multiple times with independent printers in different locations.