Rocci Stucci Media

Lawsuits in Illinois to Remove Biden From the Ballot Alleges Biden ‘Aid or Comfort to Enemies’ Through Open Border Policies

In an instance of turnabout is fair play, two lawsuits are seeking the banning of Joe Biden from the ballot on 14th Amendment grounds by accusing him of giving aid and comfort to our enemies through his open borders program. But unlike the efforts to remove Trump from the ballots, Biden has actually violated his oath of office and deserves removal not only from the ballot,but also from the country in my opinion.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Former Congressional Candidate Jack Lombardi II announced this new development through X:

“In Illinois, a lawsuit was filed against Candidate Joe Biden by Terry Newsome and others to remove Biden from the ballot.”

Terry Newsome, Illinois Chapter President Parents Involved in Education, wrote:

 “I along with 3 other Republicans filed to keep Biden off the Illinois ballot for providing aid and comfort to our enemies.”

According to the lawsuit:

Overtly beginning January 20, 2021, Joseph Biden has intentionally declined to enforce laws of the United States, in particular relation to the security of our country’s border. Exhibit A, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ACTIONS THAT HAVE UNDERMINED BORDER SECURITY AND ENCOURAGED ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, outlines 64 distinct actions taken by, at the direction, or with the approval of Biden. These actions have provided aid or comfort to the enemies of the United States contrary to Sec. 3.

Among the actions listed are not just policy decisions but active, intentional acts that are contrary to the laws of the United States, including but not limited to:

  • Illegal diversion of funds allocated for border wall
  • Flouting court orders declaring DACA illegal
  • Illegally declared a moratorium on deportations
  • Contrary to law, creating unauthorized alternatives to removal
  • Illegally exempted Unaccompanied Alien Children from Title 42
  • Illegally instituted Central American Minors Program contrary to federal statute governing family based immigration procedures
  • Following the Catch and Release protocol contrary to congressional mandate that illegal aliens “shall be detained”
  • Cancellation of wall construction by Dept. of
    Defense as authorized by Congress
  • Release of over 150,000 aliens without a Notice to Appear in court contrary to law
  • Issues memorandum that states “the fact an individual is a removable [alien] should [not be the sole] basis of an enforcement action”, contrary to law
  • suspended large-scale worksite enforcement, a key tool to deter the hiring and employment of illegal aliens, intentionally not enforcing the law
  • created a program that included alternatives to detention (ATD) plus parole, resulting in “catch and release” for hundreds of thousands of aliens into the U.S. interior after they were encountered at the border (338,000 aliens were released in Fiscal Year 2022 alone) contrary to law
  • Expanded unlawful parole programs to include individuals from Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
  • Allow Immigration Judges to administratively close or dismiss removal proceedings without any action (something not allowed by statute), resulting in no decision denying asylum.

From The Gateway Pundit

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, U.S. intelligence officials have warned of an increasing threat posed by the Lebanese Hezbollah terrorist group, suggesting that it might strike American interests in the Middle East or even within the United States.

One of the officials, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence, expressed concern about Hezbollah’s ability to execute an attack in the U.S., stating, ‘Hezbollah could utilize their capabilities to position individuals for a potential attack. It is a matter of concern.’

In October, during an address to the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in San Diego, California, FBI Director Chris Wray issued a dire warning about the rise of violent extremism, both domestic and international.




2 Responses

  1. This might work after the first on American soil attack in years since 9/11 by terrorists who have been allowed come across the southern border. It’s a matter of time.

  • Decide Right

  • On Key

    Related Posts